Initialize project and ignore local references
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
a11ac3eaba
commit
2af82b6bb3
132 files changed
+29426
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
|
||||
# Phase 1: ProjectManager Scope And Milestones
|
||||
|
||||
## Product Frame
|
||||
|
||||
- Product working name: `AgentCompany`
|
||||
- Product type: cross-platform Electron desktop application
|
||||
- Platform target: macOS, Windows, Linux
|
||||
- Primary mode: local-first single-operator control plane
|
||||
- Product goal: run a multi-agent company from one desktop application with explicit control over connectors, workspaces, tasks, runs, approvals, budgets, logs, and recovery
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope Source
|
||||
|
||||
- Existing Paperclip concept from `doc/GOAL.md`, `doc/PRODUCT.md`, `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`
|
||||
- Rebuild constraints and product direction from `/Users/zacharyzhang/Documents/Github/paperclip/PRD.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Supported MVP Domains
|
||||
|
||||
- Local profile with backup and restore
|
||||
- Multi-company local data model
|
||||
- Connector registry with capability matrix
|
||||
- Agent registry and org tree
|
||||
- Goals, projects, tasks, lineage
|
||||
- Run orchestration with session persistence and live console
|
||||
- Approval queue and governance actions
|
||||
- Cost tracking and budget hard-stop behavior
|
||||
- Activity timeline and run diagnostics
|
||||
- Workspace and repository management
|
||||
- Secret management with OS-backed encryption where available
|
||||
- Packaging, signing configuration, updater wiring, and crash-safe recovery hooks
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit Platform Decision
|
||||
|
||||
AgentCompany targets all three desktop platforms in the first implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Platform-specific constraints that must be handled intentionally:
|
||||
|
||||
- macOS:
|
||||
- standard traffic-light window controls
|
||||
- `Cmd` modifiers in menus and shortcuts
|
||||
- notification permission behavior
|
||||
- notarization and Developer ID signing requirements
|
||||
- `safeStorage` may block while Keychain access is resolved
|
||||
- Windows:
|
||||
- NSIS installer target
|
||||
- `Ctrl` modifiers in menus and shortcuts
|
||||
- AppUserModelID and toast notification expectations
|
||||
- code signing certificate requirement for trusted distribution
|
||||
- Linux:
|
||||
- AppImage target with optional deb/rpm later
|
||||
- tray behavior differs by desktop environment
|
||||
- `safeStorage` backend may degrade to `basic_text`, so fallback vault behavior must stay explicit
|
||||
|
||||
## Delivery Milestones
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Architecture Freeze
|
||||
|
||||
Feature scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- final process model
|
||||
- profile/storage layout
|
||||
- IPC contract surface
|
||||
- connector capability model
|
||||
- initial screen map
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
- PRD audit
|
||||
- Electron security research
|
||||
- platform packaging research
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- architecture docs complete
|
||||
- privileged boundaries defined
|
||||
- no renderer-to-Node direct access
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Interactive Prototype
|
||||
|
||||
Feature scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- shell window
|
||||
- top nav + sidebar + utility drawer
|
||||
- onboarding flow
|
||||
- fake local data rendered from real repositories/services
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
- design system
|
||||
- typed preload bridge
|
||||
- renderer route skeleton
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- navigable desktop shell
|
||||
- keyboard navigation baseline
|
||||
- console drawer and inspector patterns established
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Internal Alpha
|
||||
|
||||
Feature scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- local SQLite profile
|
||||
- connectors registry and environment checks
|
||||
- agents/tasks/approvals/workspaces CRUD
|
||||
- utility-process orchestrator
|
||||
- real run launch for supported local connectors
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
- repository layer
|
||||
- connector host
|
||||
- activity logging
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- launch first task run from onboarding
|
||||
- view live logs
|
||||
- persist app state across restart
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Cross-Platform Validation
|
||||
|
||||
Feature scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- window/menu differences
|
||||
- path handling
|
||||
- notifications
|
||||
- backup/restore
|
||||
- crash recovery path
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
- packaged test builds
|
||||
- platform QA checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- app boots and navigates on macOS, Windows, Linux
|
||||
- core workflows verified on each target
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Signed Beta Build
|
||||
|
||||
Feature scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- electron-builder config
|
||||
- signing env handling
|
||||
- updater channel wiring
|
||||
- production logging paths
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
- build pipeline
|
||||
- signing assets
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- signed distributables generated
|
||||
- updater checks optional and disableable
|
||||
- release metadata generated
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Release Candidate
|
||||
|
||||
Feature scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- performance pass
|
||||
- memory/resource leak pass
|
||||
- e2e coverage for critical flows
|
||||
- security audit fixes
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
- alpha feedback
|
||||
- perf instrumentation
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- no known critical security issue
|
||||
- no crash in scripted happy path flows
|
||||
- startup and live console remain responsive under load
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Production Release Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
Feature scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- release checklist
|
||||
- support docs
|
||||
- backup guidance
|
||||
- known limitations register
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies:
|
||||
|
||||
- verification results
|
||||
- signing and packaging validation
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- typecheck/build/tests pass or deviations are explicitly recorded
|
||||
- security and packaging docs complete
|
||||
- final manual QA checklist complete
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Sequencing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Connector execution begins only after IPC and orchestration boundaries are documented.
|
||||
- Renderer implementation begins only after screen structure and state ownership are defined.
|
||||
- Packaging config begins early, but signing and updater activation stay behind environment gating.
|
||||
- Kimi support is tracked explicitly. If its runtime contract remains lower capability than other first-class connectors, the UI must declare the downgrade rather than hiding it.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user