Commit Graph
9 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ZacharyZhang-NYandClaude Opus 5.5 2a89d1e883 Q144: each message says where the reply it asked for stands
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-09 00:08:32 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NYandClaude Opus 5.5 22632a4695 Q11: deleted messages and withdrawn commands never reach the model
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 03:47:57 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NYandClaude Opus 5.5 31ab919334 Q10: wake tasks no longer carry a truncated copy of the message
Manual re-runs of a chat wake answer the same thread.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 03:36:22 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 7de378b41c A chat-wake reply is delivered by the system, not by prompt compliance
A wake run whose model answered in plain final text (the coding-tuned
Kimi family does this instead of calling send_message) completed
'successfully', closed its vehicle task, and left the founder staring
at a silent conversation — the reply lived only in provider_requests.
deliverChatReplyIfMissing now runs before a chat-wake run may complete:
when the run never posted into the source thread (run-start watermark,
so a send_message it did make suppresses the fallback), its final text
is delivered as the agent's reply. A delivery failure fails the run
loudly instead of closing it on silence.
2026-07-16 11:46:53 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY aa4cfc056d Human-triggered wakes claim before queued autonomous work
Wake runs stamp sourceSenderType into their secret scope, and the claim
query orders interactive-first: a wake born from an employee or board
message means a person is waiting at the keyboard, so it outranks any
autonomous backlog; within each lane FIFO holds. Non-chat runs carry no
stamp and stay in the autonomous lane. With wake expiry this closes the
live incident: the founder's CEO DM now claims on the next tick instead
of 13th in line. Red-green tested.
2026-07-14 20:46:51 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 39aa292d09 Stale chat wakes expire instead of resuming days later
Live incident: the founder DMed the CEO and got silence — the reply run
sat 13th in a FIFO queue behind chat wakes from four days ago, which the
reopened app was faithfully executing (necro-replies that woke yet more
agents). A wake run is a conversation reply; past one hour the moment is
gone. expireStaleChatWakes (chat-agent-wake-service) fails queued
chat_mention runs older than the TTL and closes their vehicle tasks;
the worker tick runs it before claiming, with one log line. Real work
(heartbeat/kickoff triggers) never expires. Red-green tested.
2026-07-14 20:44:37 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 26de3129b1 Goals end at achieved, not at an empty board: the goal-review loop
The board draining to 280/280 done left the company idle under a
still-active goal, with 24 markdown files and zero code as its life's work.
Two structural gaps caused it: goals had no lifecycle (status was written
once as 'active' and never read again — nothing re-engages anyone when the
last task closes), and nothing anywhere distinguished plans from product,
so every "engineering" objective closed on documents.

The loop, closed:
- tasks.origin (migration 055) records provenance: chat_wake for mention
  vehicles (backfilled from their runs), goal_review for checkpoints, null
  for real work. Chatter and checkpoints can therefore never count as
  progress.
- spawnGoalReviews (each worker tick): an active goal with zero open tasks
  and real progress since the last review gets ONE review task for the goal
  owner. The review demands evidence — list the workspace, read the code,
  run the tests; documents are how work starts, not proof it happened — and
  must end in exactly one of: complete_goal, or the next wave of tasks with
  requires_filesystem engineering. A review closed with neither spawns
  nothing: termination is structural, not a counter.
- complete_goal (CEO or goal owner) finally lets someone say a goal is
  achieved, audited.
- CEO and department-head voices now state the doctrine: a goal that
  promises software closes on code that builds and passes tests in the
  workspace, and implementation is delegated with requires_filesystem: true.

On the live profile this arms one review: the active platform goal has 0
open tasks and 21 real completed ones, so the CEO gets the checkpoint on
next launch and the company starts building instead of stopping.
2026-07-09 20:29:42 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 2526633bfb Chat-wake tasks live and die with their reply run
Of the 202 tasks stranded in the backlog on July 9, 200 were "Reply to ..."
wake vehicles: every agent @mention creates a task plus a queued run, the
reply goes out, and nothing ever closed the task — a task with a completed
run is never enqueued again, so each one became a permanent zombie row. On
top of that, every message in an active thread minted a fresh wake even when
the target already had one queued, multiplying runs that would each read the
same conversation.

The lifecycle contract, made explicit:
- The reply run IS the wake task's deliverable. Completing a chat_mention
  run now closes its task (backlog/in_progress -> done, via the audited
  status path). Tasks an agent moved to review are left alone.
- One pending wake per (agent, thread): wakeFromMention returns the queued
  run instead of minting a duplicate — that run reads the thread's newest
  messages when it executes anyway.
- Migration 054 heals existing rows: wake tasks whose runs are all spent
  close as done; in-flight wakes keep working. This also stops Fix 1's
  retry-budget healing from resurrecting 31 stale replies on next launch.

The chat-governance loop test now completes each pending wake run between
posts, matching how the exchange actually interleaves in production.
2026-07-09 19:11:02 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 07d0b4587d Promote AgentCompany-New to the repository root and retire the old app
The legacy application - its src, tests, landing site, promo assets, docs,
release tooling, CI workflows, and root configs - leaves the tree; it stays
reachable in history. Everything under AgentCompany-New moves up unchanged:
same package name, so the production userData/database path is untouched,
and e2e/build scripts already resolved paths relative to the project. The
developer cred.txt stays gitignored at its new location. Full verify:ci
passes from the new root.
2026-07-07 00:04:13 -04:00