Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ZacharyZhang-NY 9246e7e312 The founder gets a dedicated execution lane, not just queue priority
Claim priority alone still left the founder waiting behind whatever long
autonomous run held the single execution slot. The worker now runs two
slots: autonomous grinds the queue one run at a time as before, while
the interactive slot claims only human-triggered wakes and executes them
concurrently — a founder message answers in seconds regardless of what
the company is building in the background. Housekeeping (wake expiry,
goal reviews, heartbeat enqueue) now runs every tick instead of pausing
during long runs. Integration test pins the concurrency: the CEO's reply
lands while a gated autonomous run is still in flight.
2026-07-14 21:15:19 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY aa4cfc056d Human-triggered wakes claim before queued autonomous work
Wake runs stamp sourceSenderType into their secret scope, and the claim
query orders interactive-first: a wake born from an employee or board
message means a person is waiting at the keyboard, so it outranks any
autonomous backlog; within each lane FIFO holds. Non-chat runs carry no
stamp and stay in the autonomous lane. With wake expiry this closes the
live incident: the founder's CEO DM now claims on the next tick instead
of 13th in line. Red-green tested.
2026-07-14 20:46:51 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 39aa292d09 Stale chat wakes expire instead of resuming days later
Live incident: the founder DMed the CEO and got silence — the reply run
sat 13th in a FIFO queue behind chat wakes from four days ago, which the
reopened app was faithfully executing (necro-replies that woke yet more
agents). A wake run is a conversation reply; past one hour the moment is
gone. expireStaleChatWakes (chat-agent-wake-service) fails queued
chat_mention runs older than the TTL and closes their vehicle tasks;
the worker tick runs it before claiming, with one log line. Real work
(heartbeat/kickoff triggers) never expires. Red-green tested.
2026-07-14 20:44:37 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 26de3129b1 Goals end at achieved, not at an empty board: the goal-review loop
The board draining to 280/280 done left the company idle under a
still-active goal, with 24 markdown files and zero code as its life's work.
Two structural gaps caused it: goals had no lifecycle (status was written
once as 'active' and never read again — nothing re-engages anyone when the
last task closes), and nothing anywhere distinguished plans from product,
so every "engineering" objective closed on documents.

The loop, closed:
- tasks.origin (migration 055) records provenance: chat_wake for mention
  vehicles (backfilled from their runs), goal_review for checkpoints, null
  for real work. Chatter and checkpoints can therefore never count as
  progress.
- spawnGoalReviews (each worker tick): an active goal with zero open tasks
  and real progress since the last review gets ONE review task for the goal
  owner. The review demands evidence — list the workspace, read the code,
  run the tests; documents are how work starts, not proof it happened — and
  must end in exactly one of: complete_goal, or the next wave of tasks with
  requires_filesystem engineering. A review closed with neither spawns
  nothing: termination is structural, not a counter.
- complete_goal (CEO or goal owner) finally lets someone say a goal is
  achieved, audited.
- CEO and department-head voices now state the doctrine: a goal that
  promises software closes on code that builds and passes tests in the
  workspace, and implementation is delegated with requires_filesystem: true.

On the live profile this arms one review: the active platform goal has 0
open tasks and 21 real completed ones, so the CEO gets the checkpoint on
next launch and the company starts building instead of stopping.
2026-07-09 20:29:42 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 927bdc91f2 Self-healing queue: transient provider failures park the provider, never burn retries
The July 9 run died at 07:22 when the GPT account hit its plan-side usage
limit: every later request failed with "The usage limit has been reached",
each failure counted against the 3-attempt retry budget, and 31 tasks were
abandoned for good while the worker kept hammering 12 doomed requests a
minute until the queue drained.

Root fix, three parts sharing one classifier:
- isTransientProviderFailure() in provider-runtime-domain recognises
  provider-side verdicts (usage limit, rate limit, 429, overloaded) plus the
  internal monthly-quota message; matching is against recorded
  task_runs.error_message rows, so historical damage heals retroactively.
- enqueueHeartbeatRuns computes the retry budget with that predicate instead
  of an exact match on the internal quota string alone.
- A transient failure parks the provider for a 10-minute cooldown: the
  heartbeat stops enqueuing its tasks and the worker leaves its queued runs
  unclaimed, then a single probe run re-arms or clears the park. Transitions
  are logged once each way.

Tests: predicate unit tests, budget-exemption regression on the raw provider
message, cooldown park/resume with an injected clock, claim exclusion.
2026-07-09 19:04:44 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY cb71afa6b7 Avatar photo uploads and a global handbrake for the agent engine
Two operator asks, one review gate:

Avatar portraits (migration 052): the avatar editor gains "Upload
photo" - the renderer downscales the chosen picture to a ~96px cover
crop and stores it as a small data URL (PNG keeps transparency, the
rest compresses to JPEG), so the snapshot stays light and the CSP needs
nothing new. The portrait wins over emoji and initials everywhere the
shared Avatar renders (chat, org chart, office card, sidebar), and
"Remove photo" falls back cleanly. The main process validates scheme
and size (base64 image data URL, <=300k chars) so a rogue caller cannot
re-bloat the snapshot. e2e uploads a real PNG through the profile
dialog and sees the portrait land in the sidebar.

Global pause (migration 053): when agents start talking in circles,
one topbar toggle - visible on every page - pulls the handbrake.
app_state.autorun_paused survives restarts; the queue worker checks it
each tick and neither enqueues nor claims while set (the run already in
flight finishes). Queued work simply waits and the paused state renders
as an amber "resume" pill. A unit test drives the real worker: paused
leaves a queued run untouched through many ticks, resuming claims it
within moments; e2e flips the toggle in the live shell.
2026-07-09 00:09:02 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 07d0b4587d Promote AgentCompany-New to the repository root and retire the old app
The legacy application - its src, tests, landing site, promo assets, docs,
release tooling, CI workflows, and root configs - leaves the tree; it stays
reachable in history. Everything under AgentCompany-New moves up unchanged:
same package name, so the production userData/database path is untouched,
and e2e/build scripts already resolved paths relative to the project. The
developer cred.txt stays gitignored at its new location. Full verify:ci
passes from the new root.
2026-07-07 00:04:13 -04:00