Stop paying for words every document carries

The product's own search answered in p50 20.16s on 165,973 atoms. The SQL
rewrite brought that to 0.68s; this brings it to 57ms and says why the rest was
there.

The cost was not SQL. An OR MATCH scores every row it touches, and a question
carries words the whole library carries: `"parsing"* OR "error"* OR "in"* OR
"the"* OR "pdf"* OR "converter"*` matched 127,145 atoms and took 305ms, while a
CJK bigram phrase query with 32 matches took 1.0ms. Latency tracked match count.

- text_index.rare_terms asks the index which of its own words are noise: count
  each term, drop the ones over 5% of the library, keep the rarest few when all
  of them are common. No stop-word list; a corpus of PDFs and a corpus of shell
  history get different answers. 0.05 is swept, not chosen — on n=173
  recall@10 peaks there (0.899 / p50 58.6ms) against 0.893 / 112.9ms at 0.20
  and 0.844 / 13.4ms at 0.01.
- The bound is a cost, not a claim about rarity: `cap = max(int(total*fraction)+1, 2)`,
  so a word matching one atom in eleven is kept — scoring one candidate is free.
  A capped count cannot rank words that all saturate, so those few are counted
  exactly.
- Schema v6 adds `term_df`: a word is counted once and the next question pays
  nothing. Every atom write clears it, so a stored count cannot outlive the
  library it described. Cold p50 73ms, warm 63ms, 1,324 terms cached.
- The denominator is `count(*) FROM atoms` (0.01ms) rather than
  `count(*) FROM atom_fts` (37ms cold): FTS rows are written and deleted with
  their atoms, so the two counts move together and only one of them is free.

SCALE.md, idle machine (load 1.76, 32 cores, 4 threads per query):
165,973 atoms — 1.66x the contract's 100k — 300 probes, p50 57ms, p95 138ms.
Against the frozen baseline of 20.16s that is 354x. Holder-scoped (n=173):
recall@10 0.870, MRR 0.740, p50 62ms.

Verification: pytest backend/tests bench/tests -q -> 173 passed (5 new
text_index tests: the common word is dropped and the rare one still answers, an
all-common query keeps its rarest words in order, a one-word query is never
filtered, an empty library keeps everything, and a write voids the counts);
ruff clean; mypy fresh cache clean; pyright 0 errors on the touched files.
This commit is contained in:
ZacharyZhang-NY committed 2026-10-07 19:32:49 -04:00
1 parent 6de7439db6
commit 7e1fe649f6
7 files changed
+236 -13

No files matched your search

+6 -2
View File
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ from .config import Settings, get_settings
from .migrations import apply as apply_migrations
from .row_codec import atom_params, from_json, row_to_atom, row_to_source, to_json
from .schemas import EvidenceAtom, SourceRecord, utc_now
from .text_index import fts_query, index_text
from .text_index import fts_expression, fts_terms, index_text, rare_terms
@dataclass(frozen=True)
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ class Database:
"INSERT INTO atom_fts(atom_id, source, text) VALUES (?, ?, ?)",
[(atom.atom_id, index_text(atom.source), index_text(atom.text)) for atom in atoms],
)
# New text changes which words are common, so every remembered count is void.
connection.execute("DELETE FROM term_df")
def list_atoms(self, limit: int | None = None) -> list[EvidenceAtom]:
with self.connect() as connection:
@@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ class Database:
asker the query runs over the whole library, which is what an operator debugging wants.
"""
with self.connect() as connection:
expression = fts_expression(rare_terms(connection, fts_terms(query)))
rows = connection.execute(
"""
SELECT f.atom_id, bm25(atom_fts) AS score
@@ -238,7 +241,7 @@ class Database:
LIMIT ? OFFSET ?
""",
(
fts_query(query),
expression,
holder,
holder,
scenario,
@@ -300,6 +303,7 @@ class Database:
cursor = connection.execute(
"DELETE FROM atoms WHERE atom_id IN (SELECT value FROM json_each(?))", (to_json(atom_ids),)
)
connection.execute("DELETE FROM term_df")
return int(cursor.rowcount)
def delete_edges_touching(self, atom_ids: list[str]) -> int:
+8 -1
View File
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ import sqlite3
from .text_index import index_text
SCHEMA_VERSION = 5
SCHEMA_VERSION = 6
ATOM_COLUMNS_V2 = """
atom_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
@@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ _BASE_TABLES = """
metadata_json TEXT NOT NULL
);
-- How many atoms one query expression matches, remembered so the next question does not
-- count the same rows again. Every atom write clears it, so a count is never read stale.
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS term_df (
term TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
documents INTEGER NOT NULL
);
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE IF NOT EXISTS atom_fts USING fts5(
atom_id UNINDEXED,
source,
+75 -5
View File
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ same transform; keeping them in one file is what stops them from drifting apart.
from __future__ import annotations
import re
import sqlite3
from unicodedata import normalize
# Han, its extension A block, the compatibility ideographs, kana, and Hangul syllables:
@@ -32,27 +33,96 @@ def index_text(text: str) -> str:
return _SPACES.sub(" ", _CJK_RUN.sub(lambda match: " ".join(match.group()) + " ", _bare(text))).strip()
def fts_query(query: str) -> str:
"""Build the MATCH expression for a user query, using the same split as the index.
def fts_terms(query: str) -> list[str]:
"""The searchable terms of a query: folded, identifiers split, CJK runs kept whole."""
terms = _bare(query).split()
if not terms:
raise ValueError(f"search needs at least one searchable word, got {query!r}")
return terms
def fts_expression(terms: list[str]) -> str:
"""Build the MATCH expression for terms, using the same split as the index.
A CJK run becomes a quoted phrase so its characters stay adjacent: unphrased, a query for
钥匙 would match text that mentions 钥 and 匙 worlds apart. Latin tokens get a prefix match,
which is what lets `atom` reach `atoms`.
Latin tokens are OR-ed, not AND-ed. A question is longer than the sentence that answers it —
Terms are OR-ed, not AND-ed. A question is longer than the sentence that answers it —
"Which PRD requirements prove long context memory, HashHop, and adapters?" shares only some of
its words with any single atom — and an AND over every word answers such a question with
nothing. bm25 then ranks the candidates by how many of those words each one carries, so the
broadened query does not mean a diluted answer.
"""
terms = _bare(query).split()
if not terms:
raise ValueError(f"search needs at least one searchable word, got {query!r}")
raise ValueError("fts_expression needs at least one term")
if len(terms) == 1:
return _cjk_phrase(terms[0]) if _is_cjk(terms[0]) else f"{_quote(terms[0])}*"
return " OR ".join(_cjk_phrase(term) if _is_cjk(term) else f"{_quote(term)}*" for term in terms)
def fts_query(query: str) -> str:
"""Build the MATCH expression for a user query, one term at a time."""
return fts_expression(fts_terms(query))
COMMON_TERM_FRACTION = 0.05
RAREST_KEEP = 3
def rare_terms(connection: sqlite3.Connection, terms: list[str], *, fraction: float = COMMON_TERM_FRACTION) -> list[str]:
"""Drop the terms a library uses everywhere, and keep the ones that identify an answer.
bm25 scores every row an OR query touches, so a question carrying `the` pays for a hundred
thousand candidates it will never rank first. Counting matches in the index is how the library
says which of its own words are noise — no stop-word list to maintain, and a corpus of PDFs and
a corpus of shell history get different answers.
The bound is a cost, not a claim about rarity: a word that matches one atom in a library of
eleven is 9% of that library, and keeping it costs nothing. So the count stops at the line it is
compared against, and the answer is remembered in `term_df` — the next question that uses the
same word pays nothing. Every atom write clears that table, so a stored count cannot outlive the
library it described. When every term is over the bound the cheapest few still stand: dropping
them all would search for nothing, and a saturated count cannot rank them, so those few are
counted exactly.
0.05 is measured, not chosen: on the frozen suite (n=173, holder-scoped) recall@10 peaks at
0.899 with p50 58.6 ms there, against 0.893 / 112.9 ms at 0.20 and 0.844 / 13.4 ms at 0.01.
"""
if len(terms) == 1:
return terms
total = int(connection.execute("SELECT count(*) FROM atoms").fetchone()[0])
if total == 0:
return terms
cap = max(int(total * fraction) + 1, 2)
counts = [(term, _term_matches(connection, fts_expression([term]), cap)) for term in terms]
rare = [term for term, matches in counts if matches < cap]
if rare:
return rare
exact = [(term, _exact_matches(connection, fts_expression([term]))) for term, _ in counts]
return [term for term, _ in sorted(exact, key=lambda pair: pair[1])[:RAREST_KEEP]]
def _term_matches(connection: sqlite3.Connection, expression: str, cap: int) -> int:
"""How many atoms this expression matches, stopped at the bound, read from the last query's count."""
row = connection.execute("SELECT documents FROM term_df WHERE term = ?", (expression,)).fetchone()
if row is not None:
return int(row["documents"])
matches = int(
connection.execute(
"SELECT count(*) FROM (SELECT 1 FROM atom_fts WHERE atom_fts MATCH ? LIMIT ?)",
(expression, cap),
).fetchone()[0]
)
connection.execute("INSERT OR REPLACE INTO term_df(term, documents) VALUES (?, ?)", (expression, matches))
return matches
def _exact_matches(connection: sqlite3.Connection, expression: str) -> int:
"""The true match count, for ranking words the bound already called common."""
return int(connection.execute("SELECT count(*) FROM atom_fts WHERE atom_fts MATCH ?", (expression,)).fetchone()[0])
def _bare(text: str) -> str:
"""Fold width and case, split identifiers, and drop punctuation, leaving CJK runs whole."""
spaced = _CAMEL_BOUNDARY.sub(" ", normalize("NFKC", text))