Give the system a directory: ask who knows, then ask them

A memory system that only answers from its own store is a filing cabinet,
not a partner. The transactive rule the project is named for — not knowing
is fine when you know who does — needed a holder registry, a directory
query, and a referral that never leaks the text it may not read.

- schema v5 adds `holders` (person/agent/service, declared topics, contact).
  A holder with memories exists whether or not anybody registered them; the
  registry adds reachability, it does not grant existence.
- `who_knows` ranks holders by their own memories and is deliberately NOT
  filtered by visibility: "she knows" is the answer. The answer is filtered.
- `ask` searches the asker's visible scope first (hop 0), then walks the
  directory with a visited set and a hop budget. Three terminal states:
  answered, referred, no_holder_knows. Nobody knowing is a result, not an error.
- Confidence is ordinal, not calibrated: relative strength, coverage, and
  declared topics. Every hit carries the raw numbers and the basis lines that
  produced the score, so a ranking can be argued with.
- Faces: HTTP (/api/holders, /api/who_knows, /api/ask), CLI (holders,
  holder-set, holder-rm, who-knows, ask), MCP (who_knows, ask, list_holders).

Four bugs found by running the thing, not by reading it:
- FTS5 refuses bm25() inside MAX(); the aggregate uses FTS5's own `rank` column.
- A CJK question is longer than the sentence that answers it, so the whole-run
  phrase matched nothing. The query now ORs adjacent bigram phrases; adjacency
  is kept, equal length is not. Latin path untouched, baseline unaffected.
- The hop budget counted the asker as a hop, so max_hops=1 asked nobody.
- A second, stricter readability test in _answered() disagreed with the SQL
  visibility clause and hid a memory the asker was allowed to read. The SQL
  clause is the only authority now.

A method named `list` shadowed the builtin inside its own class and made
mypy reject the return annotation; renamed rather than cast around it.

Proof: 155 pytest, 12 Go tests, ruff and mypy clean on touched files, pyright
ledger unchanged at 62, and scripts/mcp_write_smoke.sh drives two principals
on one SQLite file — the husband asks through MCP, gets `referred` with his
wife's contact channel, and her private sentence appears nowhere in the reply.

backend/src/ely_eye/api.py

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ from pydantic import BaseModel
 
 from . import __version__
 from .api_cartridges import register as register_cartridge_routes
+from .api_holders import register as register_holder_routes
 from .benchmarks import (
     benchmark_prediction_report,
     benchmark_registry_report,
@@ -246,6 +247,7 @@ def create_app() -> FastAPI:
             raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail=str(exc)) from exc
 
     register_cartridge_routes(app, settings_dep)
+    register_holder_routes(app, settings_dep)
 
     @app.get("/api/adapters", response_model=list[AdapterStatus])
     def adapters(settings: Annotated[Settings, Depends(settings_dep)]) -> list[AdapterStatus]: