An independent reviewer planted two witnesses that contradict their claims
and both were believed: 「恒温器很贵」 was corroborated by 「恒温器很便宜」,
「这房子值得买」 by 「这房子不值得买」. The Chinese pairs were spread inside
each run on its own, and equal-length pairs kept insertion order, so the
three demanded pairs of a multi-clause claim all came from its first
clause — and for a four-pair claim the evenly spaced index picked 0, 1, 2,
clustering them at the start anyway. An unrelated memory that merely
opened the same way pushed a quarantined sentence into the packed context.
Pairs are now pooled across the whole claim and the demanded positions are
its start, its middle and its end. The last pair is the assertion, so a
witness has to agree with the claim rather than merely introduce it. The
term-level boundary is pinned in both languages: a restatement that keeps
the compared positions counts, one that replaces them does not, a denial
that differs by one word still counts, and a changed number does not.
Also corrected the record where it had drifted: the gate cell was labelled
with a commit that never produced those numbers, the acceptance cell pinned
a total its own command could not reach, and the reader-path count stated a
conclusion without its measurement rule.
Gates: 320 passed; ruff clean; mypy cold cache 24 errors in 9 files, net
zero against the recorded baseline; pyright 0 errors on the touched files;
filesize, product audit, go suite and the two-principal MCP smoke all pass.
ZacharyZhang-NY
334071199e