The dev packages are versioned off the quattro tip, so rebuilding the
same upstream commit yields the same filename. Promotion treated any
pre-existing filename as fatal, which wedged the release loop whenever a
run promoted but died before update-repo rebuilt the database: the stale
database kept advertising the older hash, so every later run rebuilt the
identical package and failed here again, retaining the state file each
time.
Compare the bytes instead. Identical packages are skipped and the run
continues, so the following update-repo step fixes the database and the
loop unsticks itself. Differing content under a published filename still
aborts. Signatures are judged by the package they sign, since gpg stamps
a timestamp into every signature and a re-signed package never matches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
