test/shell.d/config-test.sh greps every file under migrations/ for `upgrade-to-quattro` and fails the suite when one matches, because pre-4 layout work belongs in the upgrade command rather than in a migration. The comment explaining why this particular cleanup is the exception named that command literally, so it matched the guard and config-test.sh failed on this branch while passing on quattro.
The comment now names the Omarchy 4 upgrade command without spelling the file, which leaves the guard able to catch a migration that actually reaches for it. agents/skills/migrations.md still names `bin/omarchy-upgrade-to-quattro` in full, and it is not under migrations/.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Omarchy 3 wrote 99-power-profile.rules and 99-wifi-powersave.rules with
an unquoted heredoc, baking the installing user's home into a rule udev
runs as root. That path resolves through ~/.local/share/omarchy, a
symlink the unprivileged user owns, so replacing it and provoking a
power_supply event runs their code as root. HEAD points the rules at
/usr/bin under new names, but the one-shot cleanup for the old
filenames was dropped, leaving the file on every install that came up
through the 3.x line.
Remove a legacy file only when an active RUN+= really does run that
filename's binary out of a home directory, so a rule of the same name a
user wrote themselves stays, comments and all.
