Files
David Heinemeier HanssonandGitHub 2cc3510d2a Offer an AI diagnosis when a process crashes (#6746)
* Offer an AI diagnosis when a process crashes

systemd-coredump journals every core dump under a known MESSAGE_ID with the
crashing program, pid, and signal as structured fields. omarchy-crash-watch
follows that stream and raises a "Process crashed: <program>" toast; clicking it
opens omarchy-agent-crash, which briefs the default agent on the crash.

The toast goes through omarchy-notification-send --exec rather than a libnotify
action, because the shell runs clicks from its own omarchy-exec hint and never
emits ActionInvoked. It keeps the default "omarchy-action" app name too, the
only one shouldBypassDnd() lets through -- a crash being the last notification
worth swallowing. It stays quiet until an agent is configured, since a
diagnosis is all it offers.

The method lives in a diagnose-crash skill rather than the prompt, so it is
edited in one place and works with whichever agent is default. It covers
investigating the core, and reporting a confirmed Omarchy bug upstream: scoped
to bugs Omarchy controls, searched for duplicates first, only with the user's
agreement, and signed with the model and harness that produced it.

A migration reaches existing installs, whose skill symlinks and unit enablement
would otherwise sit behind one-time setup paths.

* Let the diagnosis clean up the core it extracted

"Do not modify or delete anything" contradicted the symbolization step right
above it, which writes a core to a temp file and deletes it on exit. Read
literally, the core survives -- and the same section warns it holds passwords
and tokens. The prohibition is about the system, not about your own scratch.

* Do not spend a crash toast on a dead notification server

The shell owns org.freedesktop.Notifications, so its own crash takes the
notification server down with it -- and a shell crash is exactly what you want
told about. The toast was sent once into that gap and the dedupe window was
recorded regardless, so the rest of the crash loop went quiet for a minute and
`journalctl -n 0` never replays what was missed.

It now waits for the restarted shell to reclaim the bus name, as
omarchy-migrate-notify already does, and only a delivered toast starts the
dedupe window.
2026-08-12 18:37:40 +02:00

4.1 KiB

name, description
name description
diagnose-crash Diagnose why a program crashed on this machine, from a systemd-coredump core dump. Use when a process has segfaulted, aborted, or otherwise dumped core, when asked why an application crashed or disappeared, or when a "Process crashed:" desktop notification is acted on. Triggers: crash, segfault, SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, core dump, coredumpctl, "why did X crash", "X keeps crashing", backtrace symbolization. Covers reporting a confirmed Omarchy bug upstream — see reporting.md.

Diagnosing a Crash

Work from evidence. The goal is an honest account of what happened, not a plausible-sounding story.

Establish the facts

coredumpctl info <pid> is the starting point. Beyond the backtrace, note the command line the process was started with — it usually reveals what the program was working on when it died, which is often the whole answer.

coredumpctl list shows whether this crash is a one-off or a pattern. Repeated crashes of the same program, or several programs dying together, point somewhere different than a single failure does.

Rule out the boring causes first

Check resource exhaustion before blaming the program: free -h, and the journal for OOM kills. A process killed by the OOM killer is not a bug in that process.

Correlate against the timeline

The crash timestamp is the most underused piece of evidence. Compare it against:

  • Filesystem mtimes. A directory or file whose mtime lands on the same second as the crash strongly suggests what triggered it.
  • The journal around that moment, for related warnings from the same or neighbouring processes.
  • Recent package updates. A crash that starts right after an update points at the update.

Read the whole core, not just frame 0

Thread stacks other than the crashing one show what work was in flight — thumbnailers, image loaders, IPC readers, GPU queues. That context often explains the trigger even when the crashing frame itself cannot be symbolized.

Note any third-party code in the address space: file-manager or browser extensions, plugins, out-of-tree drivers. In-process third-party code is a common crash source and worth flagging — but do not pin blame on it without evidence that it is actually implicated.

Symbolize when you can

This is Arch, which runs a public debuginfod server:

core=$(mktemp -t crash-XXXXXX.core)
trap 'rm -f "$core"' EXIT
coredumpctl dump <pid> --output="$core"
DEBUGINFOD_URLS="https://debuginfod.archlinux.org" \
  gdb -q <executable> "$core" \
  -batch -ex 'set debuginfod enabled on' -ex 'bt'

A core is a verbatim copy of the process's memory and can hold passwords, tokens, and private documents. Write it to a fresh mktemp path rather than a predictable shared one, and delete it when you are done — never leave it lying in /tmp.

Many packages publish no debug symbols. When frames stay unresolved, say so — never invent function names to fill the gap. An unsymbolized stack still has shape: which library each frame belongs to, and whether the crash came from a signal handler, a main loop, or a worker thread.

Report

  1. What crashed, and what it was doing at the time.
  2. The most likely mechanism — separating clearly what the evidence proves from what you are inferring.
  3. Whether any user data was lost, and where it can be recovered from. Check the trash before concluding anything is gone.
  4. Whether it is likely to recur, and what would avoid or fix it.

Be straight about the limits of the evidence. If the cause is genuinely ambiguous, say so rather than assembling confidence out of guesswork.

Leave the system as you found it. Diagnosis reads; it does not fix, tidy, or reconfigure. The one thing to clean up is your own: delete the core you extracted above, which is a copy of the crashed process's memory.

If it is an Omarchy bug

Most application crashes are upstream bugs in those applications, not Omarchy's doing. In the minority of cases where the cause really does sit within Omarchy's sphere of control, read reporting.md before offering to file anything.