Review of the previous commits turned up four places where the predicates
and their tests disagreed with the tools they are modelling, each checked
against udevadm verify, systemd-analyze verify and visudo -cf rather than
against reading of the sources.
An empty ExecStop= resets the list, so a unit an administrator neutralised
that way runs nothing at shutdown and is no longer ours to remove; the
predicate now tracks the last state instead of returning on the first home
path it sees. A file whose last line ends in a backslash still carries a
live directive for systemd, so the pending logical line is emitted at EOF;
udev ignores such a line and sudo rejects the file outright, so this costs
those two nothing. The scanner's taint pass now reads += appends, which its
own comment already promised: the value of an append is no use, but a name
that reaches a user root through one has to be judged on it.
Two regression guards passed against the implementations they were written
for. The udev continuation fixture put the whole RUN+= below the comment, so
it matched whether or not the pending half was carried across; the split now
falls inside the RUN+= value. The sudoers one kept its file on the strength
of a spec above the comment, so it could not fail either; the hand-written
spec now sits below. Both fail against a mutant that discards the pending
line. The comment above the second also claimed a continued comment stays a
comment, which visudo contradicts.
acrogenesis
394c1371c9