Three independently ugly bugs that all fed the same log flood:
* Electron's `WebFrameMain.send` writes every "Render frame was disposed"
to stderr via `console.error`. When the worker fans a second
agent-event past a reloading renderer, we produced thousands of
identical lines and stalled the main loop on stderr I/O. Added a
`mainFrame.detached` guard so the send is short-circuited before
Electron's own catch block fires, and installed a targeted filter in
`suppress-warnings.ts` (now actually imported from the entry point)
so the specific `console.error("Error sending from webFrameMain:"…)`
noise never reaches the terminal. Any other payload still surfaces.
* `dispatchAgentMessage` accepted the human-reader sentinel as a wake
target when an agent replied to `__board__` — `wakeAgentIfPossible`
then called `db.getAgent("__board__")`, threw, and the dispatcher
kept repeating on every send. Strip `HUMAN_SENDER_ID` at
`resolveMessageWakeTargets`, and keep a defense-in-depth guard in the
heartbeat so a stray caller (future automation fan-out) cannot
reintroduce the crash.
* Pi's skills loader rejects any SKILL.md whose frontmatter `name`
diverges from its parent directory. The four bundled `my-writing-style`
copies declared `name: writing-style-skill`, so every install emitted
a warning and dropped the skill. They also lived as orphan gitlinks
(mode 160000 without .gitmodules), and the global `*.md` gitignore
hid every other SKILL.md from version control. Fixed the frontmatter
to match the dir, converted the dangling submodules to plain trees,
and allowlisted `builtin-skills/**/*.md` so a fresh clone carries the
catalogue instead of silently losing it.
3.0 KiB
3.0 KiB
title, impact, impactDescription, tags
| title | impact | impactDescription | tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separate Error Handling from Happy Path | HIGH | reduces nested conditionals by 50-80% in exception-based languages | err, exceptions, error-handling, separation, result-types |
Separate Error Handling from Happy Path
Error handling is important, but when it obscures logic, it's wrong. The core insight is separation: keep the happy path visible and error handling consolidated, regardless of which mechanism your language uses.
Incorrect (error handling obscures business logic):
if (deletePage(page) == E_OK) {
if (registry.deleteReference(page.name) == E_OK) {
if (configKeys.deleteKey(page.name.makeKey()) == E_OK) {
logger.log("page deleted");
} else {
logger.log("configKey not deleted");
}
} else {
logger.log("deleteReference from registry failed");
}
} else {
logger.log("delete failed");
return E_ERROR;
}
Correct (Java/C#/Python — exceptions separate concerns):
public void delete(Page page) {
try {
deletePageAndAllReferences(page);
} catch (PageDeletionException e) {
logger.log(e.getMessage());
}
}
private void deletePageAndAllReferences(Page page) throws PageDeletionException {
deletePage(page);
registry.deleteReference(page.name);
configKeys.deleteKey(page.name.makeKey());
}
Correct (Go — explicit error returns with early return):
func (s *Service) Delete(page Page) error {
if err := s.deletePage(page); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("deleting page: %w", err)
}
if err := s.registry.DeleteReference(page.Name); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("deleting reference: %w", err)
}
if err := s.configKeys.DeleteKey(page.Name); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("deleting config key: %w", err)
}
return nil
}
Correct (Rust — Result type with ? operator):
fn delete(&self, page: &Page) -> Result<(), DeletionError> {
self.delete_page(page)?;
self.registry.delete_reference(&page.name)?;
self.config_keys.delete_key(&page.name)?;
Ok(())
}
The principle is language-agnostic: separate error-handling logic from business logic. The mechanism differs:
- Java/C#/Python: try-catch with specific exception types
- Go: explicit error returns with early return pattern
- Rust:
Result<T, E>with?operator - TypeScript/Kotlin:
Resulttypes or exceptions depending on the domain
When NOT to use exceptions:
- In Go, Rust, or other languages designed around explicit error values — use their idiomatic patterns instead
- For expected business outcomes (e.g., "user not found") — consider returning
Optionalor a domain-specific result type rather than throwing - In performance-critical hot paths where exception overhead matters
Reference: Clean Code, Chapter 3: Functions and Chapter 7: Error Handling