Three independently ugly bugs that all fed the same log flood:
* Electron's `WebFrameMain.send` writes every "Render frame was disposed"
to stderr via `console.error`. When the worker fans a second
agent-event past a reloading renderer, we produced thousands of
identical lines and stalled the main loop on stderr I/O. Added a
`mainFrame.detached` guard so the send is short-circuited before
Electron's own catch block fires, and installed a targeted filter in
`suppress-warnings.ts` (now actually imported from the entry point)
so the specific `console.error("Error sending from webFrameMain:"…)`
noise never reaches the terminal. Any other payload still surfaces.
* `dispatchAgentMessage` accepted the human-reader sentinel as a wake
target when an agent replied to `__board__` — `wakeAgentIfPossible`
then called `db.getAgent("__board__")`, threw, and the dispatcher
kept repeating on every send. Strip `HUMAN_SENDER_ID` at
`resolveMessageWakeTargets`, and keep a defense-in-depth guard in the
heartbeat so a stray caller (future automation fan-out) cannot
reintroduce the crash.
* Pi's skills loader rejects any SKILL.md whose frontmatter `name`
diverges from its parent directory. The four bundled `my-writing-style`
copies declared `name: writing-style-skill`, so every install emitted
a warning and dropped the skill. They also lived as orphan gitlinks
(mode 160000 without .gitmodules), and the global `*.md` gitignore
hid every other SKILL.md from version control. Fixed the frontmatter
to match the dir, converted the dangling submodules to plain trees,
and allowlisted `builtin-skills/**/*.md` so a fresh clone carries the
catalogue instead of silently losing it.
81 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
81 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: Use Case Defines the Transaction Boundary
|
|
impact: HIGH
|
|
impactDescription: ensures data consistency, prevents partial updates
|
|
tags: usecase, transactions, consistency, boundaries
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Use Case Defines the Transaction Boundary
|
|
|
|
The use case is the natural transaction boundary. All operations within a use case should succeed or fail atomically. Infrastructure manages the transaction; use case defines the scope.
|
|
|
|
**Incorrect (transaction managed inside repository):**
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
class OrderRepository:
|
|
def save(self, order):
|
|
with self.db.transaction(): # Transaction per operation
|
|
self.db.insert('orders', order)
|
|
|
|
class InventoryRepository:
|
|
def reserve(self, items):
|
|
with self.db.transaction(): # Separate transaction
|
|
for item in items:
|
|
self.db.update('inventory', item.sku, decrement=item.qty)
|
|
|
|
class PlaceOrderUseCase:
|
|
def execute(self, command):
|
|
order = Order.create(command.items)
|
|
self.orders.save(order) # Commits
|
|
self.inventory.reserve(command.items) # If this fails, order is orphaned!
|
|
self.payments.charge(order.total) # If this fails, inventory is reserved but unpaid
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Correct (use case defines transaction boundary):**
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# application/ports/UnitOfWork.py
|
|
class UnitOfWork(Protocol):
|
|
def begin(self) -> None: ...
|
|
def commit(self) -> None: ...
|
|
def rollback(self) -> None: ...
|
|
|
|
# application/usecases/PlaceOrderUseCase.py
|
|
class PlaceOrderUseCase:
|
|
def __init__(self, uow: UnitOfWork, orders, inventory, payments):
|
|
self.uow = uow
|
|
self.orders = orders
|
|
self.inventory = inventory
|
|
self.payments = payments
|
|
|
|
def execute(self, command):
|
|
self.uow.begin()
|
|
try:
|
|
order = Order.create(command.items)
|
|
|
|
self.inventory.reserve(command.items)
|
|
self.payments.charge(order.total)
|
|
self.orders.save(order)
|
|
|
|
self.uow.commit() # All or nothing
|
|
return order.id
|
|
|
|
except Exception as e:
|
|
self.uow.rollback() # Clean rollback
|
|
raise
|
|
|
|
# Alternative using context manager
|
|
class PlaceOrderUseCase:
|
|
def execute(self, command):
|
|
with self.uow: # Transaction spans entire use case
|
|
order = Order.create(command.items)
|
|
self.inventory.reserve(command.items)
|
|
self.payments.charge(order.total)
|
|
self.orders.save(order)
|
|
return order.id
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Note:** For distributed systems, consider saga patterns or eventual consistency rather than distributed transactions.
|
|
|
|
Reference: [Unit of Work Pattern](https://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/unitOfWork.html)
|