Commit Graph
19 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ZacharyZhang-NY cf2de313dc Correct the record the second review round measured against
Round 2 found the functional side true and six record/discipline defects.

- D9: the write-path line said "comparison uses secrets.compare_digest" as if
  it covered both tokens. It does not: the operator's plaintext is compared with
  compare_digest (api_auth.py:54, :110), a holder token is SQL equality on its
  sha256 digest (holder_store.verify_token) because no plaintext is stored. The
  boundary is now stated in verify_token's docstring as well as the record.
- D10/D13: three historical numbers were written as if they were current. The
  four-file 59 is pinned to 2ea48d8 (test_trust_quarantine.py was 25 tests there,
  26 from d56996b on), and both 401 gate lines are pinned to the commit they were
  measured on (83dfc14, 89c880f) with the current 406 named next to them.
- D12: the compiler cache-key line overstated one direction. The old key had no
  identity part at all, so whoever compiled first got served to the next caller;
  an empty pack reaching the operator is one direction, not the mechanism.
- D11: the p2-5 acceptance cell's suite count is pinned the same way.
- D14: bench/video_audio_check.py wrote straight into bench/reports/, so a
  reviewer running it in its own worktree would have overwritten frozen
  evidence. It now takes --report/--payload and refuses a destination that
  already holds a frozen report; refuse_frozen_overwrite is tested, along with
  the guards that stop the harness from measuring nothing.

Gates: pytest -q 410 passed; ruff clean; bench.filesize_check OK;
bench.audit --product 33 harness files / 2 reports / 6 set files, clean;
pyright 0 errors on the three touched files; mypy cold cache Success on the same
three.
2026-10-09 19:56:33 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY a52c10499b Name the schema a leg report actually measured
LEGS.md said "schema v9" while every arm ran on v10. The harness read
PRAGMA user_version straight after copying the store, before the product
had opened it, so it printed the version the copy arrived with. The copy is
migrated on first open, and that is the schema the retrieval service ran on.

The version is now read after the arms, and the report line says both: the
copy arrives at v9, the product migrates it when it opens, every arm ran on
v10. A test pins the sentence so the two versions cannot collapse back into
one number.

Gates: bench/tests 68 passed; ruff clean; mypy clean on the three files.
2026-10-09 07:32:45 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY dc9cfb5a30 Give memories a working tier, a long-term tier, and a record of what disagrees
A memory used to have one state: present. A session could not be reloaded
without searching, nothing separated what a person said today from what the
store ingested a year ago, and two statements that disagree about a number
were both handed to the reader as if the store believed both.

Schema v10. Atoms gain session_id, importance, recall_count, last_recalled_at
and archived_at; two tables arrive beside them — consolidations (one watermark
per holder+scenario lane) and conflicts (a pair, the term they disagree on,
both values, and whether anyone has settled it). v_atoms_current now also
hides archived rows, and apply() drops the view before rebuilding it because
CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS would keep the old body and ignore the archive.

Working memory is a read, not a store: `working <holder> <session>` returns
what that session recorded, in order, with no search involved. Consolidation
rolls a lane's new memories into one standing summary and moves the watermark
to the newest memory actually rolled up — not to the clock of the pass, which
made a second pass count the same memories twice. The archive rule is stated
in the command that runs it (recorded before N days, never returned by a
search, importance at or under a floor) rather than hidden in a decay formula
nobody measured; --dry-run names the victims first.

A conflict is recorded when a new memory repeats a label with a different
number in the same holder's same scenario. Retrieval drops the older side
while the conflict is open and both sides answer again once it is settled:
settling is not superseding, and a word-only disagreement is left alone
because a reworded sentence would fire on every paraphrase. Numbers are keyed
to both the memory's subject and the nearest preceding label, measured: the
two thermostat sentences share only their subject, so a nearest-word-only rule
found nothing.

Search now counts the memories it handed back, which is the only use estimate
the store has, and the archive rule reads it. The dense index applies the same
currency rules as the view, so an archived memory cannot stay findable through
one leg while the other hides it.

Two reads over HTTP (working, conflicts) and two tools over MCP
(working_set, memory_conflicts); curation stays with the operator because an
agent should not decide what its own past is worth. remember and supersede
carry a session id; importance does not cross MCP, because recall_count is
observed and importance is stated.

Gates: 366 passed; ruff clean; mypy 24 errors in 9 files, the recorded 9cb46c1
baseline, net 0; pyright 0 on the touched files; go build/vet/test and gofmt
clean; mcp_write_smoke PASS.
2026-10-09 07:13:11 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY a6a1ef05f0 Time every modality and ask which memory came back first
One stride over file order, truncated to the probe count, dropped the
tail of the suite: a 300-probe sample held 128 code, 86 pdf, 36
screenshot, 26 image and 24 video queries and no conversation query at
all, so every report built from it measured five of six modalities.
The budget is now split by suite weight with a floor of one probe per
modality, and a test pins that the frozen sample covers all six.

The set's question type rides along on each query, and a second metric
asks the question recall@10 cannot: when the answer lives in several
dated memories, did the newest come back first? A knowledge-update
question scores 1.000 on recall while the ranking still leads with the
value the speaker has since replaced, and that is the failure the next
task is meant to fix.
2026-10-09 06:14:04 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 9145a23f18 Require a token for writes and quarantine what nobody vouches for
Sixteen mutating routes now refuse a caller who cannot present the token the
server started with; queries stay open, because a question is not a write. The
environment variable is ELY_EYE_AUTH_TOKEN, following the repo's env_prefix
convention — the shorter name I reached for first returned 403 where the smoke
expected 401, and the server printed the reason.

Words from a stranger are quarantined on the way in: an HTTP upload is
third_party by definition, and a sentence carrying an instruction-shaped phrase
is quarantined whoever wrote it. A quarantined atom stays findable and stays out
of the compiled context until a second, live, unquarantined source agrees with
its rarest words. Corroboration is computed at read time because it is a
property of the corpus now, not of the moment a memory was written; it is
term-level, and the docstring says so.

forget now erases the source row and the compiled contexts beside the atoms, so
a forgotten memory leaves nothing that can still speak. The semantic cache key
carries a store revision, which fixes a real staleness: a context compiled
before new evidence arrived kept its old quarantine decision forever.

bench.audit --product still pointed at evals.py, which the p1-6 split moved into
backend/src/ely_eye/proofs/. It failed fast, but the anti-self-justification
rule had quietly stopped auditing the product; it now walks the package, and a
test pins that the package exists and holds no re-roll.

Gates: pytest 306 passed; ruff clean; mypy cold cache 24 errors in 9 files, the
recorded baseline, net zero; pyright 0 errors on the 23 backend files and the 2
bench files; go build/vet/test and gofmt clean; npm run build 221.39 kB with
eslint exit 0; bench/filesize_check clean; bench.audit --product clean over 31
harness files; scripts/mcp_write_smoke.sh PASS with the gate live across two
servers and the MCP child.
2026-10-08 23:05:15 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 71733d86d6 Stop the checklist from quoting numbers no artifact carries
A review of the p2-1 record found seven places where the prose had drifted
away from the reports it cites. None were product defects; all were record
keeping, and record keeping is what a memory system is judged on.

The quantization row mis-transcribed nine latencies, and the two worst made
dimension truncation look twice as fast as the full scan when the report
measures six percent. The extrapolation table scaled latency by atoms and
bytes by vectors under one heading that named neither switch. The picture
index stats existed only in prose, so the harness now reads the index shape
off the artifact and times the encoder on a sample, which reproduces the
hand-timed build within seven percent. The dense arms named a store that
holds no vectors, so the report names the store the vectors came from and
refuses to run where a dense leg would rank an empty index.

The frozen baseline was migrated in place by the product CLI while the
picture index was built, so its pinned mtime, digest and schema version are
re-pinned and the step that moved it is named. The sqlite_vec import added
two mypy errors; the fix is the missing stub declaration, not an inline
ignore, and the count is back to the recorded baseline of twenty-four.
2026-10-08 18:51:41 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY dff5977ab6 Measure what each retrieval leg is worth before choosing a default
The product fuses a sparse page, a dense vector leg, and a picture leg that
only speaks when the words come back thin. Two of the three are off by
default, and until now no committed artifact said why.

bench/leg_check.py asks the frozen suite's 300 answerable queries as their
own holder, once per configuration, and prints recall, first-hit quality,
latency and per-modality recall in one table. The picture index and the
CLIP snapshot are 48 minutes of encoding, so they are carried in rather
than rebuilt per row; the harness refuses to run a leg whose snapshot is
missing instead of quietly scoring nothing.

The numbers that came back:
- words only, 10 atoms: recall@10 0.832, MRR 0.683, p50 64ms
- words only, the configured 24: 0.848, 0.688, 69ms
- words only, page 30: 0.855, 0.690, 67ms
- dense leg on: 0.845 / 0.858, MRR down, p50 469ms / 411ms
- picture leg available: 0.815 / 0.825, MRR 0.553 / 0.551, p50 148ms / 164ms

So both defaults stay off, and the acceptance bar (recall@10 >= 0.90) is
not met by the product path yet: 0.858 is the best measured row, the
in-repo counterpart at holder scope is 0.866. The loss concentrates in
picture golds, and the current CLIP leg pays more in dilution than it
returns there.

CHECKLIST p2-1 and p0-3.7 now quote the committed reports (DENSE.md,
QUANT.md, SCALE.md, TERMS.md) instead of scratch scripts.
2026-10-08 16:15:18 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 9cb46c18d3 Keep every file inside the rules the repo already wrote down
The 500-line rule and the one-line-comment rule were enforced only from
memory, so they drifted. bench/filesize_check.py now checks the budget on
every tracked source file, and it passes.

Split, with behaviour proven unchanged by comparing each moved function body
against HEAD byte for byte (53 training bodies, 21 benchmark bodies, 0
differences):

  db.py        503 -> 396   store_search.py     105
  bench/run.py 609 -> 351   query_set.py         80, report.py 211
  benchmarks.py 619 -> 424  benchmark_scoring.py 262
  training.py 1630 ->  94   training_{common,encode,metrics,datasets,lora,retrieval}

TrainingService stays as a thin facade for the CLI; the facade's parameter
lists are pinned against the module functions by inspect, which is what
catches a leaked self.

Deleted the eight top-level functions no file called, after fixing the scan
that had reported 201 false positives by skipping the defining file. The
v1/v2/v3 sweep found nothing to delete and says so: every remaining version
tag is an on-disk format marker, a migration step, a fixture name, or a
third-party model name.

Collapsed 39 multi-line comment blocks (86 lines) to one line each, keeping
the measured facts and error strings that justify the code.

269 tests pass; ruff clean; mypy 24 errors in 9 files against a 24-in-6
baseline, net zero; pyright 4, the same four HEAD measures.
2026-10-08 08:20:21 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 62e2a14a3d Keep the new stub's docstring to one line
The reviewer's round 2 verified all nine round-1 corrections by re-measuring
them, then failed the commit on the one thing it added that the repo's own bar
forbids: a two-line docstring on _TinyDense. p1-6.4 still lists "comments to one
line" as open work, so a new commit should not widen it. The 470MB rationale
already lives in CHECKLIST.md.

Also cites the CI run for the commit under review (37744547992 @ 20c0416, also
success) instead of stopping at the previous one.
2026-10-08 04:12:52 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 4b367cb59b Let the harness tests run on a machine that has no models
CI failed four tests with "SystemExit: bench/models/paraphrase-multilingual-
MiniLM-L12-v2: model not downloaded". The claim those tests make is that the
joint ablation pass ranks exactly like the per-arm pass and that three arms
needing BM25 score the corpus once. That is a claim about the harness, not
about embedding quality, so it should not require a 470MB download to check.

The tests now inject a deterministic 384-dimensional stand-in dense model and
a stand-in cross-encoder at the seam both paths share. The real models still
carry every measurement in bench/reports; nothing measured changed.

Proven by the condition that broke: with both model directories moved out of
the tree, the whole suite passes (253 passed).
2026-10-08 03:04:45 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 6de7439db6 Score the product path against corpus ids, not storage ids
The frozen baseline claimed the product's top-10 shared 0.0% with the fast
BM25 path. That was a harness bug: gold names a corpus source
(mmlongbench:PH_2016.06.08_Economy-Final.pdf) while the store names a content
hash (PH_2016_06_08_Economy_Final_10e57152f44d1a2b), so the two id spaces never
met and the right document, ranked first, scored as a miss.

- bench/systems.py: `_corpus_ids` joins store sources through the
  `source_map()` the counterpart already uses, and refuses a store whose
  sources are not corpus files instead of silently scoring zero.
- bench/systems.py: `live_product_rankings(..., as_holders=...)` asks the
  product as the query's own holder, which is how the counterpart is scored.
- bench/run.py: the live section now reports recall@10 / MRR / hit@10 with a
  95% lower bound, and probes 300 queries instead of 40 — the SQL path answers
  in well under a second, so the old cap was a cost estimate that expired.
- bench/run.py: `--name CURRENT` writes a post-P0 report beside the frozen
  BASELINE without touching it, stamped with the commit and the store schema
  version the pass started on (the live pass migrates the store mid-run, so a
  plain stamp would be a lie).
- bench/stamp_holders.py: the pre-P0 store holds 165,973 memories nobody owns.
  The corpus index states the owner, so holders, scenarios and event times are
  stamped in place — 165,973 atoms across 50,278 sources, 0 left unowned.

Numbers, same machine, load 1.0-1.7:
- CURRENT (post-P0, schema v5): no_rerank recall@10 0.565 p50 0.643s;
  fusion+rerank 0.453 p50 7.000s; graph 0.001.
- Product as its holder: recall@10 0.870, MRR 0.740, n=173.
- Counterpart: mem0_flat holder scope 0.866, whole corpus 0.412; the holder
  boundary is worth +0.454 with an identical ranker and identical items.

Verification: pytest backend/tests bench/tests -q -> 173 passed; ruff and mypy
(fresh cache) clean on every touched file.
2026-10-07 19:32:32 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 674c88e84e Rank memory search in SQL instead of rebuilding BM25 in Python
The product path pulled every atom into Python and rebuilt a BM25Okapi
index per query: p50 20.16s over 165,973 atoms. It now runs one SQLite
statement with LIMIT/OFFSET.

- text_index.py: one normalizer for both sides of the index. CJK runs are
  split per character (unicode61 cannot segment them), camelCase and
  separators are split so "search atoms" finds SearchAtoms, latin tokens
  get a prefix match. Rows written before this existed hold raw text in
  atom_fts, so schema v3 rebuilds the index on upgrade.
- retrieval.py: filters (holder / scenario / source / modality / since /
  until / min_trust), a base64 cursor, and reciprocal rank fusion in place
  of the 0.55/0.35/0.10 blend whose graph term was always zero.
- An empty result is {status: "no_match"}, not a bare array.
- Go: search_atoms and compile_context rank through POST /api/search. The
  second Go tokenizer is deleted; two implementations could drift, which
  is what the MCP/HTTP parity requirement forbids.
- db.py passed 500 lines, so the row codec moved to row_codec.py.
- Tooling: installed the repo's own pyright. pyrightconfig.json had no
  exclude and swept the downloaded corpus (1171 errors); with excludes the
  count is 62, all pre-existing (evals 48, profiles 4, training 4,
  ingestion 3, runtime 2, cartridge_assets 1). backend/pyproject.toml
  carried a second [tool.pyright] that shadowed the root config; deleted.
- bench/scale_check.py measures the product search at corpus size. The
  100k-atom p50 number is not written until it is measured on an idle
  machine.

Verification: 112 pytest passed; go build/vet/test clean, gofmt clean;
ruff clean on every touched file; mypy clean on the 14 touched Python
files; repo pyright 62 errors, unchanged per-file ledger.
2026-10-07 16:02:40 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 00dc9f8eaf Re-measure arm latency on a warm-model sample instead of trusting the cache
rankings.jsonl stores the seconds each query took, so the report inherited whatever
the machine was doing at the time: the frozen baseline's dense latency included a
per-query model load, and the 50,000-source row moved from 1.315s to 0.809s between
two runs of identical code.

- bench/run.py: --remeasure-latency N re-times a stride sample with warm models and
  replaces each arm's latency section, recording the sample size and a note; recall
  stays a full-pass number. BASELINE.md prints that note under the table.
- bench/tests/test_joint.py: 62 tests total.

Verification: pytest bench/tests -q -> 62 passed; ruff check bench/ -> all checks
passed; mypy (fresh cache) -> no issues in 25 source files.
2026-10-07 13:39:17 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY dbe1d2cc82 Measure the counterpart honestly: warm models, vectorised search, scope split
Three defects made the external baseline numbers and labels wrong.

- bench/systems.py: _sentence_model rebuilt the model on every query, so dense arm
  latency was mostly model loading and the latency-vs-size curve was flat because a
  constant dominated it. Models are now cached per process.
- bench/counterpart.py: visible() and search() walked 404k Python objects per query.
  Per-item holder/source/time columns are built once and the query path is numpy;
  12.5 queries/s instead of 0.7.
- bench/metrics.py: the aggregate key was named wrong_holder_confidence_unanswerable
  while it counts top hits that ARE from the asking holder. BASELINE.md read that
  backwards. Renamed to top_hit_from_holder_unanswerable and the sentence rewritten.
- bench/run_external.py: the by-modality table read row['answerable'] but aggregate
  emits n_answerable, so the writer died after scoring finished. Each store is now
  scored twice, [holder scope] and [whole corpus], so the gain from the holder
  boundary is separable from the gain from ranking; progress lines every 500 queries.

Verification: pytest bench/tests -q -> 61 passed; ruff check bench/ -> all checks
passed; mypy (fresh cache) -> no issues in 25 source files.
2026-10-07 13:33:13 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY c4e2982506 Record machine load with every latency number
Latency measured while another job hogs the cores is not comparable: the scale curve
moved from 1.315s to 0.809s at 50,000 sources between two runs of the same code.

- bench/systems.py: machine_facts() reports cpus plus the 1/5/15 minute load average.
- bench/run.py, bench/run_external.py: both reports carry it, and BASELINE.md labels
  the latency table a ceiling when the machine was busy.

Verification: pytest bench/tests -q -> 60 passed; ruff check bench/ -> all checks
passed; mypy (fresh cache) -> no issues in 25 source files.
2026-10-07 12:03:44 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 61f6506104 Explain the product path's zero overlap and fix the report writer
The frozen baseline showed the unmodified RetrievalService agreeing with an equivalent
BM25 index on 0% of its top ten results. Reproduced by hand: its top ten atoms came
from one document's pages, so a source-level ranking cannot overlap it.

- bench/systems.py: live_product_rankings also counts distinct sources behind the
  product's top-k atoms.
- bench/run.py: scale probes no longer filtered by gold (a source prefix keeps almost
  no gold, so the 500/2,000/10,000 rows were silently skipped); scale_arm_names reads
  only latency dicts, which is what crashed write_markdown on the note field; the
  unanswerable share is computed instead of hard-coded.
- bench/tests/test_joint.py: 60 tests total, including the writer regression.

Verification: pytest bench/tests -q -> 60 passed; ruff check bench/ -> all checks
passed; mypy (fresh cache) -> no issues in 25 source files.
2026-10-07 11:33:44 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY 29163632af Score all five arms in one resumable pass
The per-arm runner recomputed BM25 and the dense matmul for every arm, which put the
full ablation at roughly 16 hours and left no way to survive a kill. JointRunner
computes each signal once per query, attributes latency to the components each arm
uses, and checkpoints every query to runs/baseline/rankings.jsonl.

- bench/systems.py: JointRunner + ARM_COMPONENTS signal attribution.
- bench/run.py: joint pass, rankings cache with a run fingerprint, per-query resume,
  latency summary, resident-memory progress lines.
- bench/tests/test_joint.py: joint rankings equal the per-arm rankings for all five
  arms; the sparse corpus is scored once even with three arms that need it; cache
  fingerprint mismatch and malformed rows fail fast.
- bench/reports/EXTERNAL_APPENDIX.md: what a real Mem0/Zep run would cost, and which
  published numbers are comparable at all.

Verification: pytest bench/tests -q -> 57 passed; ruff check bench/ -> all checks
passed; mypy (fresh cache) -> no issues in 25 source files.
2026-10-07 01:45:55 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY a4953335e7 Join the product's source ids to the benchmark's before scoring
The merged database names a source by content hash (`11089_4f2a...`) while the
frozen sets name the same file by its corpus id, so every arm scored 0.000 until
load_atoms joined atoms through sources.path. It now returns corpus ids and
refuses an atom it cannot trace to a corpus file.

Also fixes found by running the harness:
- merge rebuilt atom_fts from the deduped atoms table; two attempts on one file
  left 288,266 fts rows for 165,973 atoms.
- merge accepts the two honest reasons a corpus file has no product source
  (500 byte-identical LongMemEval sessions collapse under content hashing, and
  12 photos that ONNX Runtime cannot decode) and reports them.
- --arms used action=extend against a non-empty default, so naming two arms ran
  seven.
- the dense cache is keyed by the atom set, so a scale-curve subset cannot be
  scored with full-corpus vectors.
- write_markdown crashed on a run that covered only some modalities.
2026-10-06 16:49:11 -04:00
ZacharyZhang-NY fc0698c242 Add baseline harness: ingest, metrics, ablation arms, external counterpart, audit
- bench/ingest_baseline.py drives the unmodified product IngestionService over
  all 50,789 corpus files in sharded SQLite DBs, then merges them. Thread and
  memory ceilings are set explicitly: ONNX Runtime defaulted to every core
  (95 threads/worker, load 490) and its CPU arena kept freed pages mapped,
  which OOM-killed workers.
- bench/metrics.py: recall@k, MRR, nDCG@10, Wilson lower bound, chance
  baseline. No model, no product import, so the scorer cannot grade itself.
- bench/systems.py + bench/run.py: the five ablation arms over the merged DB,
  latency percentiles, scale curve, and a top-10 equivalence check against the
  live RetrievalService.
- bench/counterpart.py + bench/run_external.py: in-repo Mem0-style flat store
  and Zep-style temporal store as the external reference point.
- bench/audit.py: enforces single-attempt scoring, frozen n, a chance row
  beside every score, and producer != verifier. It already flags the product's
  retry-until-target loop at backend/src/ely_eye/evals.py:2351.
- backend/pyproject.toml: rapidocr-onnxruntime>=1.4.4 was unsatisfiable
  (PyPI maxes at 1.2.3); the successor is the renamed rapidocr package.
2026-10-06 14:36:02 -04:00