acrogenesis 394c1371c9 Model what each parser does with an empty and a dangling directive
Review of the previous commits turned up four places where the predicates
and their tests disagreed with the tools they are modelling, each checked
against udevadm verify, systemd-analyze verify and visudo -cf rather than
against reading of the sources.

An empty ExecStop= resets the list, so a unit an administrator neutralised
that way runs nothing at shutdown and is no longer ours to remove; the
predicate now tracks the last state instead of returning on the first home
path it sees. A file whose last line ends in a backslash still carries a
live directive for systemd, so the pending logical line is emitted at EOF;
udev ignores such a line and sudo rejects the file outright, so this costs
those two nothing. The scanner's taint pass now reads += appends, which its
own comment already promised: the value of an append is no use, but a name
that reaches a user root through one has to be judged on it.

Two regression guards passed against the implementations they were written
for. The udev continuation fixture put the whole RUN+= below the comment, so
it matched whether or not the pending half was carried across; the split now
falls inside the RUN+= value. The sudoers one kept its file on the strength
of a spec above the comment, so it could not fail either; the hand-written
spec now sits below. Both fail against a mutant that discards the pending
line. The comment above the second also claimed a continued comment stays a
comment, which visudo contradicts.
2026-08-29 19:23:02 -06:00
2025-11-03 10:50:54 +01:00
2025-10-07 18:17:47 +02:00
2026-05-11 10:39:22 -04:00
2025-06-30 16:42:09 -07:00
2025-07-28 09:32:44 +02:00
2025-07-26 10:02:29 -07:00
2026-05-14 11:34:55 +02:00
S
Description
OmarchyCN — China-native, AI-first Omarchy downstream distribution (based on basecamp/omarchy, quattro baseline)
Readme MIT
239 MiB
Languages
Shell 58.8%
QML 29.8%
JavaScript 4%
Python 3.1%
Go Template 2.3%
Other 2%